Don't Watch the Dow

Explainer: Answers to your questions about the news.
Don't Watch the Dow

Here’s the number that really captures the financial crisis.

By Brandon Fuller
Posted Thursday, October 9, 2008 - 10:07am

Generations of Americans have been trained to follow the Dow Jones Industrial Average for a quick snapshot of how the economy is performing or is expected to perform. There's a lot that's ill-advised about that habit, but, most importantly, attending to the ups and downs in the Dow won't tell you much about the current financial crisis. Ours is a crisis of credit: Financial firms are unwilling to lend to each other (at all-but-exorbitant rates) for fear that borrowing firms may fail or that they themselves may need the cash to fend off their own crisis.

Whereas the hourly fortunes of the Dow or any stock index are, at best, indirect reflections of this reluctance to lend, the TED Spread measures credit conditions directly. Bloomberg tracks the TED Spread here. What sounds like second-rate Nutella is actually the difference between the interest rate banks charge each other on three-month loans and the interest rate on three-month U.S. Treasury bills.

Why TED? The T comes from "T-bill," shorthand for short-term Treasury bills, and the ED comes from "eurodollar contracts." Because interbank lending is international, loans between banks are often called eurodollar transactions. The three-month interbank interest rate is what an American bank can expect to receive for a dollar loan to a European bank (or any other bank, for that matter-"euro" is just a bad substitute for global here), or vice versa. Not surprisingly, interest rates on loans between banks are higher than the interest rate on T-bills. The higher interest rate on interbank loans compensates for the fact that a short-term loan to a bank is riskier than a short-term loan to the U.S. government.

The TED Spread typically stays under 50 basis points (half a percentage point). Things got atypical in August 2007, when subprime mortgage troubles began making waves in the U.S. housing market. The spread moved above 100 basis points, climbing above 300 basis points in the more recent tumult surrounding the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.

What explains the big spread? It's due, in part, to all of the toxic assets the Treasury hopes to soak up from the financial system with the $700 billion Congress freed up last week. Lenders in the interbank market need an exceptionally high interest rate to extend credit to banks that may be overexposed to bad assets, pushing the interest rate on interbank loans further above the rate on three-month Treasuries. If the borrowing bank were to fold in the ensuing three months, the lender would find itself snared in the mess.

The spread reflects falling yields for three-month Treasury bills as well. As toxic assets poisoned the balance sheets of Bear Sterns, Fannie, Freddie, Lehman, and AIG, investors sought refuge in the relative safety of treasuries, paying higher prices for the three-month bills and accepting lower yields (even negative yields at one point).

  • Brandon Fuller writes content for Aplia in California.
  • Comment Comment
  • RSS RSS

Comments

  • 4 Total
  • • Pending Comments 0
  • Login or register to post comments

The Stimulus bill

Hopefully, all alternative would be successful on saving our falling economy. The government is working on the economic stimulus package. There's a great deal of suspense over when the payday loan to the economy we're all waiting for is going to be made available. Our economy needs to create jobs and get things moving again is almost passed. It may seem that the economic stimulus package is a long way off, but it is being worked on. This has been the biggest priority for President Obama since day one. Luckily, he got right to work on it.

It's not 1929

First of all, statistical indicators about market performance at this stage of the game are absolutely useless. I mean, when you have market behavior that occurs only once out of every 100,000 times statistically, your statistical indicators (and the laws of probability as they govern market behavior) can be pretty much thrown out of the window.

That's why history is important, and that's why technical analysis (which my wife refers to a chicken entrail readings) is the only halfway reliable indicator of what's going on right now.

There are some good historical anodynes for the situation we're in right now. The panic of 1907 and the mini-depression of 1921 are good analogies, as is the dot.com crash of 2000-2003. With the events in the market of the last two weeks, all of these situations look fairly close to the immediate period we're in right now.

The market will fall like a boulder in the middle of the Pacific Ocean until it reaches some magical, mystical number where the big boys decide that things are really, really cheap. And then we'll have a huge bear market bounce.

Dow 7700? Dow 6200? Dow 5800? Dow 4000? You decide.

Incorrect about Eurodollars

"Euro" is not "just a bad substitute for global." Euro denotes that a deposit is held outside the US but in American dollars. Thus one of the keys is that eurodollar accounts are not governed by the Fed. The TED Spread is the difference between the three-month T-bill(American) interest rate and three-month LIBOR (London InterBank Offered Rate). Yes, the greater the TED the greater the perceived risk in commercial loans, but your fundamentals are off. Please focus more on research than linking to outside articles.

Not incorrect about Eurodollars

What a silly, snippy little comment, what might appear to be the product a little mind. Mr. Fuller's characterization of the term "eurodollar" is just fine. Perhaps it might be a bit U.S.-centric, equating anything outside the U.S. as "global". In any case, the comment is uninformative.

Good article. Informative, and an excellent primer for those of us still trying to wrap our brains around the mechanics of the credit crunch.

I've read of other references to the TED Spread as a bellwether for this "crisis". I appreciate the Bloomberg link.

Read more comments