Throwing Voodoo at Hulu

Throwing Voodoo at Hulu

The networks thought they had Web distribution figured out—until they met Boxee.

Single Page
  • Paul Smalera has written for Condé Nast Portfolio, The New York Times and The New York Observer among others. He blogs at true/slant.

Comments

  • 5 Total
  • • Pending Comments 0
  • • Login or register to post comments
Submitted by nacoran on Fri, 05/29/2009 - 2:43pm.

Don't let people bundle...

It seems to me if the cable companies really wanted to protect their core products they should offer a top of the line internet connection for say, $100/month with the idea that, yes, this will cannibalize our cable and phone, but then throw in cable and phone for free. Internet is the only service that isn't in dire jeopardy right now. They could still offer cable and phone as stand alone products, but since internet essentially duplicates them they will die. Meanwhile, the cable companies save a little bit of the cable industry and some bandwidth. Sure, lots of people will download shows when they want, but every person who watches a show at it's regular time gets to still feed off that one set of cable signals instead of each show being an individual download. The move could fend off companies like Skype, who rely on you already having an internet connection. The other bundle carriers could try to offer just internet at a cheaper cost, but they would risk eroding their own base. The government, meanwhile, should straighten out the regulation of the industry. The reason you bill is so complicated is all the little charges the government tacks on. Depending on whether you are a phone carrier or a cable company you have to charge different fees for the same services, for instance, the government requires phone carriers to provide 'life line' services to some phone customers, including the disabled and the elderly. It costs a fraction of what regular phone services cost, but cable companies (and cell phone carriers for that matter) don't have to offer a similar service.

Submitted by HD Motsinger on Sun, 03/01/2009 - 6:27pm.

Nixing Boxee Won't Save Cable (ha!ha!)

Hi Paul, I had to chuckle while listening to the podcast (On the Media Feb 27). I've been watching TV thru the internet ON my TV screen for over a year now and I'm no tech wiz. I have an old (five year? six?) laptop that sits on the shelf below my TV. The two are connected via a simple S-cable...I simply took the end that was stuck in my DVD player and plugged it into my old laptop...and promptly got rid of the DVD player. (It was redundant given that laptops also play DVDs....). I go to the control panel in my computer, click on monitor/display, and click to use the TV as my "monitor" (or display content on the laptop and TV both). And the TV I now watch is BETTER, thank-you Hulu, Fancast, TV.com, ABC.com, not to mention the far-superior VIP.TV-video.net with a selection that's 10-fold that of the others. (Though not free -for the equivalent of 14 euro's - around $18 - I bought 750 points in July. They deduct 2 pts to access, for the next 24 hrs, each [ad-free] episode.) Now I only watch shows I truly enjoy and I do it on my schedule with no forethought (forget Tvio!). I have all the sites bookmarked - little icons that run across the browser's toolbar (Firefox), which I can open in multiple tabs and switch back-n-forth between. I have a remote control for my laptop, but haven't bothered to program it yet. As far as I'm concerned, one-stop shopping has already arrived!!

Submitted by Ashu Joshi on Sat, 02/28/2009 - 4:00pm.

Hulu & Boxee

Hi Paul, I listened to your podcast interview on NPR and half way through the interview you have made a very important observation - that Netbooks with prices @ $300 start becoming very attractive to be the "STB". I think this will be a serious threat with potential impact to several people both downsides and upsides. In this cost-cutting season, consumers may choose to double up their netbooks for watching TV. May be having accessories such as Dock Stations that will connect to TVs and with a remote control? Regards Ashu

Submitted by tlmosier on Thu, 02/26/2009 - 11:22am.

Hulu

I want to request that from now on when your reporters cover emerging TV access, like Hulu or even TVIO that you ask them if they support captioning of their videos. Neither one does. Tvio has captioning ONLY if you watch off the tvio, if you transfer the recording in any manner, the Tvio strips the captions. Hulu has no feature whatsoever that allows you to view the captions that ALL of this content has when it plays live on tv. As for Boxie, who knows? You left that out of your story.

Submitted by HD Motsinger on Sun, 03/01/2009 - 7:11pm.

Closed Captioning on Hulu

Actually, I just went to Hulu and clicked on the support/FAQ link b/c I thought I recalled seeing "cc" options on the site. Hulu does have closed-captioning for some of the shows, which (they state) they're trying to expand, but note that cc-data used for broadcast TV doesn't translate easily to an online format. They also give detailed explanations of how to filter your search to programs with cc only, how to set it as a default preference, how to turn it on in the viewer, and offer a link to Tech Support for further questions/concerns. I'm really less interested in defending Hulu than in defending accuracy. Now that the general public has the opportunity to put into the public medium our ten cents (or $10) worth on virtually any topic, we also have the responsibility - whether we shoulder it or not - to fact-check ourselves (particularly in instances when it is quite easy to do so) before passing on incorrect information.