Bonuses Make the Busted Go Boom

Bonuses Make the Busted Go Boom

Tales from the suburbs where bankers do think they deserve the bonuses.

Posted Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 9:41am

The logic behind the AIG bonuses perplexes most people. We've gone from wondering who would give out these rich rewards to asking who is brazen enough to take one for imperiling the world economy. Barney Frank and Andrew Cuomo have issued or threatened subpoenas that could help name (and therefore, presumably, shame) recipients from AIG's financial products division. That's the great mystery of the bonus fiasco: Don't the recipients feel any sense of responsibility?

Here I think I can offer a tiny bit of enlightenment. By a strange quirk of fate, I live in a waterfront suburb of Manhattan popular with the middling level of the financial elite, the kinds of people who get $1 million bonuses—and feel very entitled to them.

The worst trick of the credit bubble, a trick made crueler by the bubble's long life, was to convince so many that the money they made was more than an opportunity—it was a benediction. Not that a lot of my neighbors have been feeling so blessed lately. For the financial community, the crisis is entering its third year. It's becoming clearer that our way of life is changing irrevocably, and there's more than a little antagonism about who's to blame.

There's a civil war raging out here. It's not a class war in the traditional sense. It is a conflict between the haves and the used-to-haves.

One side of our town is filled with the shock troops of the overleveraged economy. These are the people most upset about Obama's $500,000 salary cap. They are Goldman guys and Morgan Stanley folks, hedge funders who levered up, investment bankers who packaged aircraft leases, and private-equity guys who rolled up insurance companies. From their perspective, the boom was a well-deserved reward for their years of dogged apprenticeship. A decade on the 5:55 a.m. train to Manhattan is enough to convince anyone that they're deserving of seven-figure compensation.

Let's not leave out all the lawyers who serviced these transactions. (One woman I know addressed her husband loudly at a cocktail party as Mr. World's-Leading-Expert-on-Credit-Default-Swaps. The scorn in her voice was playful ... or was it?) Nor should we overlook the run-of-the-mill banking executives and traders of every flavor who tromp up and down the streets of our hamlet. These lives on Wall Street are a long slog through a dark tunnel. Many are looking up now only to see the far-off light flickering out, not because they never made money but because the money was never enough to cover all of the necessary expenses.

  • Marion Maneker is a regular contributor to The Big Money.
Sinking Yacht
  • Comment Comment
  • RSS RSS

Comments

  • 5 Total
  • • Pending Comments 0
  • Login or register to post comments

Maybe they reason their

Maybe they reason their bonuses as a "strange quirk of fate", just like you.

Boo Hoo

I wish I had a job where I could make gobs of money for contributing absolutely nothing worthwhile, destroying people's life savings, the financial system, the economy as a whole, and still get a huge bonus. People who do a good job don't get AIG type bonuses. Now your friends know how everyone else feels.

A simpler life

Eventually economists will come to terms with the fact that there needs to be real robust regulation of the markets. They are a very powerful tool, but like any power tool, much discretion is warranted in their use. People have very systematic errors in their decision making, they are not even remotely rational in many common economic situations and modern companies are incentivized to exploit people's errors as much as possible. Most people including I would guess most of your friends, would be much happier working half as much and spending 1/3 as much. But we are envious competitive creatures and our economic system thrives on scratching our itch to better our neighbors. Imagine if in the US we bought new cars every 5 years instead of every 3, and only had 2 televisions per home instead of 7 etc. and we all worked 25 hours a week instead of 45. Don't you think most people would be happier? Our current economy convinces people to overspend through many types of consumption traps, and then they must overwork to make up for it AND pay off interest while they do it. I am 27, came from a family with zero wealth, I have worked on average maybe 20-30 hours a week for around 15 dollars an hour, my fiancee works full time at more or less the same wage. Yet we have two paid off cars and a house that will be paid off in 7 years. I haven't used a credit card since I was 16. It is amazing how much money 50k a year is when you don't buy jet skis and trips to Aspen and limit yourself to house only 3 or 4 times the global average for living space instead of 30 or 40 times. We eat meat with every meal, we are in no way spartans, we just simply don't buy things we cannot afford and never take out debt on anything. Eventually people are going to need to learn to make do with less, and in the end they will be happier for it. in the mean time economists will keep trying to convince everyone that more GDP is better...

"Imagine if in the US we

"Imagine if in the US we bought new cars every 5 years instead of every 3, and only had 2 televisions per home instead of 7 etc. and we all worked 25 hours a week instead of 45. Don't you think most people would be happier?" Since everyone is free to do that now and yet chooses not to, I would say the answer is no. Fortunately, you know what makes people happier better than they do themselves. I'm glad that we have a government of wise men like you to run our lives for us.

Bonuses Go Boom

Did your friends ever notice that those 5:55 trains were filled with plenty of others?

Read more comments