Cool, Refreshing Legislation for Philip Morris

Cool, Refreshing Legislation for Philip Morris

Why it’s politically impossible to ban menthol cigarettes, even if they’re the most addictive.

Posted Monday, June 8, 2009 - 2:56pm

As early as 1998, Philip Morris executives were worried about the continued existence of their industry. Big Tobacco was locked in a battle with Congress over advertising and product regulations. And it was reeling from the $264 billion settlement in the lawsuit brought against it by 46 state attorneys general over Medicare costs for smokers. The future was hazy, and the tobacco companies' ability to fight costly legal battles for the indefinite future was in doubt.

So, as Roll Call recounts, Philip Morris executives made a huge shift in tactics. Rather than beat back every attempt at industry regulation, they initiated the secret Project Sunrise, an effort to help craft those regulations. Part of the strategy was to work with the very anti-smoking groups they had fought for years. Big Tobacco decided to sue for peace in order to win at the negotiating table.

Philip Morris found a willing partner in the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. It was among the more moderate anti-smoking groups, and some of its top staff had worked for Sen. Tom Daschle, so they were well-versed in the art of legislative compromise. The existence of an agreement between Philip Morris and the Campaign is how Rep. Henry Waxman, the bill's main sponsor, has justified the perverseness of Philip Morris' support for a supposed anti-smoking bill.

"Don't let perfect be the enemy of good," has been the old saw the administration uses to admonish interest groups dissatisfied with compromise legislation. But opponents of this bill on both sides are asking, What's the enemy of terrible? Isn't it this bill, which is racist, protectionist, cynical, and misguided? And barring an improbable veto, it will soon become law. Nowhere is the bill's perfidy more obvious than in its failure to ban menthol cigarettes.

The National African American Tobacco Prevention Network released a statement on the bill last May that read, "Tobacco legislation that treats menthol differently from other flavoring additives is incomplete." This is in response to studies showing that menthols are far more addictive then other cigarettes and far harder to quit, no matter what race the smoker is.

And last July, the Harvard School of Public Health released a study showing that tobacco manufacturers carefully controlled the menthol content of cigarettes to maximize its masking of harsh tobacco smoke, even creating new brands for longtime smokers who require increasing amounts of menthol to maintain its numbing, cooling effect.

  • Paul Smalera has written for Condé Nast Portfolio, The New York Times and The New York Observer among others. He blogs at true/slant.
Graphic by bamby/Shutterstock.
  • Comment Comment
  • RSS RSS

Comments

  • 4 Total
  • • Pending Comments 0
  • Login or register to post comments

Its amazing!

I think its crazy that these companies can get away with murder. Hundreads of thousands of people die each year to smoking related causes. I have a instruments acoustic guitars website and if my product started killing people imagine how long I would be in business. This is scary, just because these companies have people in Washington that protect their intrests they can get away with this. This is truly amazing!

FDA abuses power

Unfortunately, the FDA is starting to interfere with the rights of Americans by abusing their power. There becomes a point where the FDA stops advising Americans (As is its role) and starts withholding their rights. A perfect example of this is their attempt to ban the electronic cigarette, even though they have the potential to save millions of lives. The FDA feels its within their power to take a product off the market that has thousands less chemicals than traditional cigarettes. Is this not an abuse of power? Informing people of the health ramifications of products is well within reason, removing a product that could save their life is not.

Johnny Blaze

If 80% of all African-American smokers smoke menthol...

then I suppose that there's an 80% chance of a menthol preference for a certain African-American in the Oval Office. That would certainly be a rather, um, large obstacle.

the Philip Morris Aid Bill

Kudos to Paul Smalera. A beautiful and accurate picture of this fraudulent legislation--of, by, and for Philip Morris--which stands a good chance of increasing cigarette-caused deaths in the US. The bill has just been passed by Congress. The next step must be to convince the President not to sign it. That effort can be made by e-mails to his web page, by public statements such as editorials and public letters, and by other means that will occur to inventive readers of Slate. Readers in touch with ongoing efforts to replace this bill by genuine anti-smoking legislation ought to inform the rest of us of their work; we need to join in their efforts. The Senators who voted against this bill ought to speak out. In case the President signs the bill we need a creative and organized strategy to undo it and replace it by legislation that will truly cut into the death toll. The first step ought to be the immediate legalization of electronic cigarettes. They resemble cigarettes in delivering nicotine, but differ from them in delivering no tobacco tars whatever--the cause of the deaths. They resemble the entirely legal nicotine patches and gum in delivering nicotine, but differ from them in mimicking the effect of cigarettes. It is surely no coincidence that the bill seeks to ban the one cigarette replacement that has a chance of large-scale success. Make no mistake. This is a bill that will cost lives. If you have lost a good friend or relative to cigarettes, isn't it worth it to make an effort--in their name--to fight back? I am posting my actual name and email address as a step in encouraging opponents of the Philip Morris Aid Bill to come together and organize. Stephen Voss shvoss@gmail.com

Read more comments