The Loan Ranger

The Loan Ranger

Why Obama’s plan to ease troubled mortgages will be harder than it sounds.

Posted Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - 1:28pm

As President Obama heads to foreclosure-pocked Phoenix this week to announce his administration's plans to help mortgage borrowers crushed by debt stay in their houses, a lot of suffering homeowners are asking what took him so long. The number of them doomed to foreclosure is growing so fast that Credit Suisse had to revise its projections twice in 2008. Its analysts now predict that some 8.1 million homes will meet that fate by 2012—an astounding one in six of all households with mortgages.

Yet so far only a teeny bunch of homeowners—a few thousand IndyMac borrowers, under the ministrations of the FDIC as their government caretaker—has received any financial assistance from the federal government, even as the Treasury and Federal Reserve unleash trillions of dollars to keep banks and the economy afloat.

You might think that straightening out a $400,000 mortgage would be massively simpler than righting sinking financial institutions nominally worth billions. Yet rescuing homeowners could turn out to be among the toughest bailout challenges of all. While the bank aid seeks to make sure institutions have enough capital to stay in business, a humble home mortgage involves (let's keep this simple for a moment) a pact between two parties—the borrower and the lender. In good times, both borrowers and lenders gain by sticking with the agreement. In these very, very bad ones, borrowers and lenders are locked in a conflict over who gets to hold on to the benefits they signed up to get—for the homeowner, to keep the property deed, and for the lender, to collect every penny the borrower pledged to pay back.

The Obama administration's task is to build borrowers and their creditors a fleet of seaworthy rowboats that will escort all to safety together using a very small amount of wood—just $50 billion or so, or about $6,000 for each of those doomed homes, many of which are saddled with more than one mortgage.

Over the past year or so, lenders and borrowers have been attempting to do exactly this on their own, without federal assistance, via what are known as loan modifications—new agreements determining how much borrowers have to pay and when. The results of these loan mods have, with few exceptions, been awful. Federal banking regulators recently reported that of the mortgages modified at the beginning of 2008, more than half were headed to foreclosure again within six months. Loan mods made later in the year were on track to do even worse.

What most loan mods have done so far is dig homeowners even deeper into debt. Alan White of Valparaiso Law School, who reviewed data reflecting several million recent loan mods on high-risk mortgages, estimates that they've been adding $1 billion more every month to the already high total of what the nation's borrowers owe.

Comments

  • 12 Total
  • • Pending Comments 0
  • Login or register to post comments

Governments Plan

It's great to know that government is planning to help the mortgage borrowers. The worldwide financial market is facing great difficulties because of the economic meltdown. Mortgage borrowers have to pay much more money than ever which make the situation worse. 

While a financial plan refers

While a financial plan refers to estimating future income, expenses and
assets, a financing plan or finance plan usually refers to the means by
which cash will be acquired to cover future expenses, for instance
through earning, borrowing or using saved cash.

car loans melbourne

Re

"The basic math of mortgages is quite impervious to change. On a 30-year mortgage, a lender can either make personal loans cheaper to pay every month or cost less over their lifetimes. It's not possible to do both without significantly reducing the principal owed, and $50 billion is far from enough" NOT SO! The current 30 year bond rate is 3.5%...if FNMA offered 3.75% 30 year mortgages (financed by bonds)at 120% Loan-to-value, and that were assignable to future buyers, it would cost the government virtually nothing and drastically stimulate housing demand, creating a bottom in the market. Because 90%+ of most at-risk mortgage payments are interest at 6%+, the monthly payments would fall by almost half. There has never been a 30 year period where housing has not risen by at least 20%, thus securing the loan.

The mortgage has become the

The mortgage has become the problem where it doesnot even  have the definite period.Any increase in apprised value, resulting in higher selling price will
go into reduction of the size of the balloon, not to the pockets of the
home seller.

 

 

As President Obama heads to

As President Obama heads to foreclosure-pocked Phoenix this week to A loan is a type of debt. Like all debt instruments, a loan entails the redistribution of financial assets over time, between the lender and the borrower.

 

 

A loan is a type of debt.

A loan is a type of debt. Like all debt instruments, a loan entails the redistribution of financial assets over time, between the lender and the borrower.

 

 

 

 

solution to youh's problem

I am signing in this blog post in its fullness. I had experiences in the past applying for ASP NET position where I was refused because I had a small flaw in my own implementation of C itoa function (converting between number systems without any help functions) I was really sad about it, but then after a while I have realized that if they treat candidates "as numbers" and not as people and give generic questions regardless of what you apply for, than they would probably treat me as a number once I would start to work for them. Life is to short for being a number :) Thanks for the great post!

Densilin

Can I sell a home which is on home loan before 5 years which was claimed for tax deduction?

lol @ loan ranger

The king of the soundbite, mr toothpaste himself is making promises he cant keep. I hope for americas sake he is all he promises to be but i cant help but think he is more smiles than substances. If he reduces monthly outgoings and reduces the need for people to resort to instant decision loans then the ecomony would stabalise in months. I will believe it when I see it.

Loan Ranger

"The basic math of mortgages is quite impervious to change. On a 30-year mortgage, a lender can either make loans cheaper to pay every month or cost less over their lifetimes. It's not possible to do both without significantly reducing the principal owed, and $50 billion is far from enough" NOT SO! The current 30 year bond rate is 3.5%...if FNMA offered 3.75% 30 year mortgages (financed by bonds)at 120% Loan-to-value, and that were assignable to future buyers, it would cost the government virtually nothing and drastically stimulate housing demand, creating a bottom in the market. Because 90%+ of most at-risk mortgage payments are interest at 6%+, the monthly payments would fall by almost half. There has never been a 30 year period where housing has not risen by at least 20%, thus securing the loan.

Read more comments