Great old cars en route to the crusher.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.Adieu, ClunkersThe federal government's Cash for Clunkers program was so successful that it blew through $1 billion dollars and compelled Congress to find $2 billion more to sustain a stimulus measure that may have saved the U.S. economy. For a car or truck to qualify, it must be worth less than $4,500 or $3,500 (depending on the MPG difference between the old vehicle and the new one) and less than 25 years old. Essentially worthless as vehicles, their time has drawn to a close. But there are a lot of semi-classic rides that make this cut. Famous for their cultural associations, they deserve an appreciation.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.Volvo 240The wagon defines this legendary Swedish hauler of the American ruling class, whose heyday ranged from the early 1970s until ... well, now. Enthusiasts refer to the boxy, capacious 240 as a "brick," and its ability to transport large quantities of everything from field hockey gear to Labrador retrievers lent it a certain unpretentious pre-SUV panache. But no longer will parents in WASP-casual couture use the 240 to drop off successive waves of offspring and their gear at Harvard and Yale. Surviving examples found in East Hampton, N.Y.; Berkeley, Calif.; and suburban Boston.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.Jeep Grand WagoneerThe only American SUV that really had any class, the Jeep Wagoneer—in blue, with wood panels—was to the habitués of Martha's Vineyard, Mass., what decrepit Range Rovers were to the Windsors at Balmoral, Scotland. Produced from the early 1960s until the early 1990s, it was big, it was basic, and it often reeked of dog but frequently added aromas of motor oil, Coppertone, and Mary Jane. Surviving examples found on Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard, where the Grand Wagoneer is the Mercedes of the dunes. See it in its element here.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.Cadillac EldoradoThe last of the great Caddy pimpmobiles was supplanted by bland designs after 1986 and later obliterated by Cadillac's aggressive, Stealth Fighter look of the 2000s. Who can forget the prowlike Caddy grill, framed by boxy headlamps, crowned with a hood ornament, all awash in glistening chrome? Give me a sweet set of whitewalls, acres of creamy upholstery, and a ride built to be enjoyed at speeds under 30 mph. This was the ultimate cruising machine. Surviving examples found on Hollywood back lots, waiting for the next costume drama, set during the Carter administration.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.Porsche 928"Joel ... every now and then, say ‘What the fuck?' " The year was 1983, and Tom Cruise would show the pluses and minuses of Risky Business long before anyone had even imagined a CDO. And he would do so behind the wheel of the 928. Joel may have outrun Guido the Killer Pimp in his dad's 928. But for enthusiasts, there was a 928 substitute: the classic 911. Think all Porsches deserve to live forever? Then watch this episode of Top Gear and witness the trials as the co-host tries to keep his 928 alive. Surviving examples found in the more naff upscale retirement communities.
-
Photo from Wikimedia Commons.G-Body GM CoupesGM did platform engineering like nobody else—taking a base structure and building models for multiple nameplates. A high point of this practice was the G-Body family, rear-wheel-drive two-doors with relatively powerful engines. Plenty of Buick Regals, Chevy Monte Carlos, Oldsmobile Cutlass Supremes, and Pontiac Grands Prix will now visit the crusher. What made these dinosaurs great? They were Rust Belt redneck rides with style, and they could be fun driven slow or driven hard. Surviving examples found up on blocks in various dying industrial towns.
RSS
Twitter

Comments
Volvo??
Just some facts for the writer/site. The rules of the CARS program were simple: trade in your old car/truck with a combined mileage (rated on the EPA website) of less than 18 mpg, built in '84 or newer, and purchase a new vehicle which had a combined mileage at least 2 mpg greater (for $3500 rebate) or 10 mpg greater (for $4500 rebate) than your trade-in.
There are only a few Volvo 240s built in '84 and '85 that qualified for the rebate: the '84 and '85 turbocharged sedans and wagons (17 and 18 mpg combined, respectively). On the CARS website it indicates that a total of 11 were traded in, along with several other Volvos that may have been improperly accepted as trade-ins. Keep in mind, the database only depicts the vehicles that dealers accepted as trade-ins, not necessarily those that qualified. There is a validation process that takes place before any dealer receives a rebate voucher. I think you'll find a great many of the vehicles traded in may not qualify for the rebate upon validation.
Huh?
"Essentially worthless as vehicles, their time has drawn to a close."
This statement makes no sense. A low-mileage Volvo is not "essentially worthless": it still drives, dagnabbit! These cars are not, by any reasonable use of the term, "clunkers." The problem with "Cash For Clunkers" is its corruption of language for political goals. After all, "Cash To Destroy Perfectly Good Cars" would probably not be as popular - but at least it would be honest. Shame on you for blindly parroting the administration's talking points!
Don't You Fact Check?
The Volvo 240 shouldn't be included as it got too good of mileage to qualify. I know because I've got a '92 240 Wagon that I would've been more than happy to trade in.
Doesn't anyone fact check your writers? 2 glaring errors and counting in one single article. I guess you guys were too busy trying to be clever to get the fact correct.
Hardly...
On cars.com the avergae price of a Porsche 928 is in the vicinity of $20,000... The high is $49,500.
Even the low ($3,900) for a probable basketcase with an automatic transmission (and missrepresented as having AWD - all wheel drive) suggests both a depserate and foolish seller.
Anyone who turns in a 928 under this program has got an absolute dog - which is rare - or is flatout dumb.
"For a car or truck to
"For a car or truck to qualify, it must be worth less than $4500 or $3500..."
This is not true. The value of the vehicle has NOTHING to do with whether it qualifies or not. The only qualification is the difference in MPG between the old vehicle and the new.
"clunkers" must get 18 mpg or less
This is a great list, but at least the BMW 325, the diesel Mercedes and the 1st generation Miata (of which I am a proud owner) should not be on the list because they get combined fuel economy above 18 mpg, and therefore do not qualify for CARS/cash for clunkers.
Thanks, we fixed
Thanks for pointing this out. We've corrected the slide show.
325i's Sadly are eligible
I did not catch this article before you removed the BMW 325 from the list. Sadly, if you were referring to the E30 325i models they are eligible for the CARS program (http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/CarsResult1.jsp?column=1&id=6454).
The older BMW E30's with ETA engines (325 or 325e) have a more fuel efficient engine and do not qualify for the program.